Most Popular Stories
- CMS investigates hospital for harsh collections, EMTALA violation
- Temple, doc pay $1M to settle fraud claims
- Ex-hospital VP pleads guilty to bribery, kickbacks, theft
- Kinect works toward degree in early autism diagnosis
- Joplin hospitals share lessons on disaster planning
- High-volume hospitals are more costly for all patients
Events
- Northwestern Online Master of Science in Medical Informatics Program
- 2nd Annual Medicare Advantage Compliance Symposium
May 31, 2012 — Washington Plaza Hotel, Washington, DC - Webcast: Engaging Patients as Consumers
Tuesday May 22nd 4:00 pm ET - 2nd Annual Medical Devices Summit West
June 7-8, 2012 — DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel San Diego - Mission Valley San Diego, CA
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthPayer provides the latest news about the fast-changing and heavily regulated area of healthcare reimbursement. Join 16,000 healthcare plan executives who get FierceHealthPayer via twice weekly email. Sign up today!
Top Tags
HHS hopes to pressure insurers into lowering rate hikes
Health insurers seeking to raise premium rates by 10 percent or more will face increased scrutiny under a final rule released by the Department of Health and Human Services. The rule attempts to pressure insurers to drop plans for major increases and make the rate-setting process more transparent, reports The Hilll’s Healthwatch.
Starting Sept. 1, independent experts must examine any proposed increase of 10 percent or more for most individual and small group plans, with states bearing most of the rate review responsibility, according to the Wall Street Journal. States with "effective" rate review systems, which are capable of collecting data sufficient to determine whether a rate increase is unreasonable and allow for public comment, will perform their own reviews. If a state can't do an effective review, HHS would do it for them, Kaiser Health News reports.
That threshold will be replaced in 2012 by state-specific levels that reflect health insurance cost trends in those areas. HHS said it will work with the states in developing those thresholds, the WSJ notes.
HHS officials, however, were careful to point out that the 10 percent increase only triggers disclosure requirements--it doesn't automatically render the rate hike unreasonable, notes PBS Newshour.
Although the rule doesn't grant states or the federal government the power to reject a health plan's rate hike, Steve Larsen, director of HHS' Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, said that publicizing a high rate increases may be enough of a deterrent for an insurance company to avoid proposing double-digit increases in premiums or to withdraw such a proposal, according to MedPage Today. "A state doesn't need to specifically turn a rate down in order to raise questions about an increase and have a back-and-forth with an insurance company about how they came to their numbers," Larsen said.
The rule also forces insurers to explain the reasons behind any double-digit hikes and show their work on the federal government's website, as well as their own. Health plans also must provide a broad overview of what they plan to spend the money on, including how much would go to medical services, profits and administrative costs, according to the New York Times Prescriptions blog.
To learn more:
- read the HHS rate review rule (.pdf)
- see the Wall Street Journal article
- read the PBS Newshour story
- check out the New York Times Prescriptions blog
- see the MedPage Today article
- read the Kaiser Health News piece
- here's The Hill's Healthwatch blog post
Related Articles:
States' rate review programs receive $200M boost from HHS
Proposed ACA rule: Insurers face tighter rate review
HHS may extend rate reviews to large group market
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| EditorsTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceCRO | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2012 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
